Sunday, April 13, 2008

English only?

As I have looked into both sides of the official English debate over the years I often look at the argument in business terms. To begin with is the money and effort being put in to this worth the effort? It would seem to me that no matter what ends up happening it seems that the end result will likely never pay off for the people trying to make English the official language. After all will people just suddenly stop speaking other languages the day the law passes? Will we have to hire language police to patrol the streets making sure people are no longer making bilingual signs to say there business is open closed? I think we can all agree that most likely all that would happen is that government agencies would not be required to print papers in languages other then English, but after a short period as non-English speakers sue because something happened due to their inability to understand something the entire law would have to be reexamined. It seems to me that in spite of the best efforts of people trying to make English the official language people all over the world are attempting to learn it. I think that rather then making English the official language we should continue to make it a language that people would want to learn by being a successful globally minded country .

1 comment:

Matt Pope said...

I think that you are right about not much coming of English being the "official" language but I do think that it is important. I don't think it should make bilingual material illegal in government or anything of the sort but that businesses/government should only be required to provide materials in English. This of course with a 10 year plan or something like that to force those who don't speak English to do so before they won't be catered to anymore.